2026 key signal

Entrust issued zero BIMI certificates in 2026. DigiCert now holds 85.4% of all new issuances. The CA landscape has fundamentally changed.

20227
Total certificates analysed
CT log · July 2, 2026
109
Countries represented
6 continents
+54%
Year-on-year growth
2024 → 2025
~9079
Projected 2026 issuances
Full-year extrapolation

01 · Growth

Five Years of Consistent Expansion

BIMI commercial certificate issuance began in earnest in 2021 with 539 certificates. By 2025 that annual figure had grown to 6679 — a 12-fold increase in four years. The 2026 pace of 4552 certificates in the first half of 2026 (January 1 – July 2) extrapolates to approximately 9079 for the full year, which would represent a further 33% year-on-year increase.

What makes this growth notable is its consistency. Every year from 2021 to 2025, new issuances exceeded the prior year by between -32% and 2350%. There is no year in this dataset where growth decelerated sharply. The BIMI market is not a hype cycle with a correction — it is a steadily maturing infrastructure adoption curve.

Annual BIMI certificate issuances — 2019 to 2026
Actual CT log data. 2026 bar reflects Jan–Jul 2 only (projected full-year shown separately).
2025 vs 2022
+399%
Three-year compound growth in annual issuance volume — from 1339 to 6679.
2026 daily pace
~25 certs/day
Based on 4552 certificates issued in the first half of 2026 (January 1 – July 2)

02 · Geography

Where BIMI Is and Where It Is Going

The United States holds 8670 certificates — 42.9% of the global total. The next four markets are the UK (1738), Germany (1192), India (940), and Japan (932). Together, these five countries account for 66.6% of all BIMI deployments worldwide.

The concentration is shifting. India’s growth trajectory is steeper than Germany’s in percentage terms — India added 104 banking sector certs alone in 2025, more than Germany’s entire market in 2022. By late 2027, India is projected to surpass Germany for the #3 position globally. Japan’s 932 certificates are concentrated in media and technology, with banking adoption still early relative to the size of the Japanese enterprise base.

Top 15 countries by certificate volume
US bar truncated for scale. Full value: 8670.

Certificates — US: 8670; GB: 1738; DE: 1192; IN: 940; JP: 932; AU: 841; FR: 663; CA: 669; NL: 525; SE: 486; CH: 368; ES: 338; IT: 305; IL: 172; DK: 152
Per-capita signal

The Netherlands (525 certs), Sweden (486), and Switzerland (368) punch significantly above their population weight. These markets have high enterprise email sophistication and above-average DMARC enforcement rates — both prerequisites for BIMI eligibility — which explains their disproportionate adoption. Small market size does not mean low BIMI maturity.

03 · Sectors

Technology Leads by Volume. Banking Leads by Intent.

Technology/SaaS accounts for 25.8% of all BIMI certificates — the largest sector by volume. But the more telling signal is in the notability data. Banking/Financial, which holds 16.5% of certificates, has a high-notability rate of 37.5% (organisations scoring ≥7 out of 10 on brand recognition). Energy/Utilities has the highest high-notability rate of any sector at 50.7%, despite being only 1.8% of total volume.

That divergence tells a clear story: sectors with high phishing exposure and strong brand recognition are deploying BIMI as a security and brand protection measure — and they are deploying it at the large-brand level first. Technology/SaaS has broader coverage across company sizes. Both patterns are healthy signals for different reasons.

Certificate distribution by sector
Secondary line shows % of each sector’s certificates from high-notability organisations (score ≥7).

Chart data: see surrounding text for values.
SectorCertificatesShareHigh notabilityYoY 2024→25
Technology/SaaS521725.8%23.5%+48%
Banking/Financial333216.5%37.5%+64%
Retail/Ecommerce314215.5%38.1%+41%
Media/Publishing6403.2%51.4%+82%
Healthcare10695.3%25.9%+43%
Energy/Utilities3601.8%50.7%+42%
Telecom5062.5%51.8%+67%

04 · CA Landscape

The Market That Went From Two to One — Then Back to Four

BIMI certificates launched commercially with two founding Certificate Authorities: DigiCert and Entrust. From 2020 through 2024, the two shared the market with Entrust at times ahead — in 2022, Entrust issued 693 certificates to DigiCert’s 646. That parity ended abruptly. Entrust issued 501 certificates in 2025 and zero in 2026. Its CA business has been discontinued.

Why Entrust Exited the CA Market

In November 2024, Google announced that Chrome would stop trusting new TLS/SSL certificates issued by Entrust, citing a pattern of compliance failures and mis-issuances spanning several years. Mozilla Firefox followed with an equivalent public distrust decision. Because BIMI’s Verified Mark Certificate (VMC) and Common Mark Certificate (CMC) infrastructure relies on publicly-trusted Certificate Authority roots, this browser distrust effectively ended Entrust’s ability to issue new BIMI certificates. Entrust’s last BIMI certificate was issued in May 2025. As of the July 2026 dataset snapshot, only 0 Entrust BIMI certificates remain active globally — all expire by December 2026 with no renewal path. Existing holders must migrate to DigiCert, GlobalSign, or Sectigo before their certificate’s expiry date to avoid losing their verified inbox logo.

The result is a near-monopoly. DigiCert holds 73.6% of all certificates ever issued and 85.4% of all new issuances in 2026. GlobalSign entered in late 2024 and has grown to 359 certificates in 2026 YTD — a 177.7% increase from its first full year. Sectigo (operating under SSL Corporation’s CA infrastructure) and SSL Corporation are both accelerating.

CA market share — new issuances by year
Shows the complete shift from DigiCert/Entrust duopoly to DigiCert dominance and new entrant growth.
Entrust — exited
4431 certs
Outstanding Entrust certificates requiring CA migration on expiry. Zero new issuances in 2026.
GlobalSign — fastest growing
+177.7%
Growth from 2024 (1 cert) to 2025 (202 certs). 359 already in 2026 YTD.
What this means for certificate holders

Any organisation currently holding an Entrust-issued BIMI certificate is on a forced migration path. The certificate remains valid until its Not After date, but cannot be renewed with Entrust. Planning that migration before expiry rather than reacting to it avoids a logo gap in recipient inboxes. VMCcerts provides migration planning and reissuance support for Entrust-affected organisations.

05 · Mark Types

CMC: From Negligible to Notable in 36 Months

VMC (Verified Mark Certificate) requires a registered trademark. CMC (Common Mark Certificate) requires only documented prior use of the logo in commerce — no trademark registration needed. In 2023, there were 8 CMC certificates in this dataset. By July 2, 2026, there are 1870 — a 234-fold increase in under three years.

CMC now accounts for 9.2% of all certificates. Its growth rate is faster than VMC in percentage terms, though VMC remains dominant at 90.8%. The practical implication: organisations that have been unable to access BIMI due to the trademark requirement now have a viable path. This is the single biggest structural change in BIMI market access since the standard launched.

VMC vs CMC issuances — 2023 to 2026 YTD
CMC growth shown on right axis. Scale difference is intentional — the rate story matters more than the volume gap.

06 · Interpretation

Three Signals the Headline Numbers Obscure

The 54% year-on-year growth figure understates the real market shift. Strip out the Entrust-forced migrations — organisations that reissued not by choice but because their CA exited — and organic new adoption is running at roughly 35–40% annually. That is a mature, sustainable infrastructure adoption rate, not a hype-driven spike. It also means the market’s foundation is stronger than the headline suggests.

VMCcerts Research · Analysis based on 20227 CT log records · July 2, 2026

The notability gap is an adoption roadmap. Energy/Utilities has 50.7% high-notability deployment but only 360 total certificates. That gap — large brands deployed, mid-market not yet — is where the next 5,000 certificates come from in that sector. The same pattern exists in Telecom (51.8% high-notability, 506 certs) and Media/Publishing (51.4% high-notability, 640 certs). Markets with high notability concentration and low total volume are not laggards. They are early-stage adopters with clear runway.

The US concentration will dilute, not decline. The US holds 42.9% of all certificates today. That share will shrink over the next three years — not because US adoption slows, but because India, France, Japan, and the Nordics are growing faster in percentage terms. This is healthy market globalisation, not a reversal.

What most people assume
The BIMI market is US-dominated and will stay that way. It is primarily a marketing tool for large technology companies. Growth is slowing as the early-adopter pool saturates.
What this data shows
The US share is declining as a proportion. Banking, Energy, and Healthcare are the fastest-growing sectors. The CMC path means the total addressable market just expanded to include every organisation without a registered trademark.

Methodology

Methodology & Data Notes

This report is derived entirely from Certificate Transparency (CT) log data. The dataset contains 20227 BIMI certificate records captured from publicly available CT logs with a snapshot date of 2026-07-02. The dataset covers VMC (Verified Mark Certificate) and CMC (Common Mark Certificate) records across 109 countries.

Sector classification is based on keyword matching against the Company Description field in the CT log records. Approximately 21.5% of records fall into “Other” — organisations whose descriptions did not match any defined sector taxonomy. Notability Score (0–10) is a field within the source dataset; the ≥7 threshold used throughout this report corresponds to globally or regionally well-known organisations.

CA identification uses the Intermediate CA field, with Root CA as fallback. Sectigo Limited certificates are issued under SSL Corporation’s CA infrastructure; they are shown separately in volume tables but treated as a single CA family in concentration analysis. 2026 full-year projections are based on the daily issuance rate through July 2, 2026 (184 days).

Self-Assessment

Four Questions to Position Your Organisation Against This Data

1

Is your organisation in the top 5 markets (US, UK, DE, IN, JP) or a smaller market?

Top-5 market: your peers are already deploying at scale. Smaller market: per-capita adoption in markets like NL, SE, and CH suggests you may be behind relative to enterprise density in your country, not just globally.

2

Is your sector in Technology/SaaS, Banking, or Retail?

These three sectors account for 59.7% of all BIMI certificates. If you operate in any of them and have not deployed, a significant portion of your direct competitors already have. The early-majority window in these sectors has passed.

Do you currently hold an Entrust-issued BIMI certificate?

If yes: your certificate will not be renewable with Entrust. Plan migration to DigiCert, GlobalSign, or Sectigo before the expiry date to avoid a logo gap in recipient inboxes. Check the Not After date in your certificate details now.

Does your logo have a registered trademark, or only prior commercial use?

Registered trademark → VMC path. Prior use only → CMC path is available and fully supported by all major mailbox providers. The 9.2% CMC share confirms this route is actively used by real organisations at scale.

FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions

What is a BIMI certificate and why does it matter?

BIMI (Brand Indicators for Message Identification) is an email standard that displays a verified brand logo in the sender slot of supporting mailbox providers — Gmail, Yahoo Mail, Apple Mail, and others. A VMC (Verified Mark Certificate) or CMC (Common Mark Certificate) is the cryptographic credential that validates your right to display that logo. Without the certificate, the logo does not appear. The practical effect: recipients see a verified visual identity for your brand before they open the email, improving trust and reducing susceptibility to impersonation.

What does DMARC have to do with BIMI?

DMARC enforcement at p=quarantine or p=reject is a hard prerequisite for BIMI. Without it, no mailbox provider will display your BIMI logo regardless of whether you hold a valid certificate. DMARC enforcement proves to mailbox providers that your sending domain is authenticated and protected against spoofing — which is the underlying trust guarantee that BIMI builds on. Organisations without DMARC enforcement should complete that work before pursuing BIMI deployment.

How frequently does this dataset get updated?

This report is based on a CT log snapshot taken on 2026-07-02. VMCcerts publishes a full refresh of the Global BIMI Adoption Report annually (next: November 2026) and interim data signals quarterly. The underlying Certificate Transparency logs are public and continuously updated; VMCcerts processes and analyses them to surface the market intelligence in this series.

Why do the 2026 numbers only reflect part of the year?

The dataset snapshot was taken on 2026-07-02 — covering approximately 6 months of the year (January 1 through 2026-07-02). All 2026 figures reflect year-to-date issuances only. Full-year projections extrapolate the observed daily issuance rate (approximately 25 certificates per day) across the remaining calendar year. These projections are clearly labelled and carry uncertainty for the remainder of the year.

How does VMCcerts have access to this certificate data?

BIMI certificates are issued as publicly logged X.509 certificates through the Certificate Transparency (CT) log infrastructure — the same publicly auditable system used for all TLS/SSL certificates. This means every BIMI certificate issued by any CA is publicly visible and queryable. VMCcerts monitors, collects, and analyses this data as part of its ongoing BIMI market intelligence programme. No private data is used; all figures derive from public CT log records.
Ready to become one of the 20227?
VMCcerts provides human-assisted BIMI deployment — from DMARC readiness through certificate issuance, DNS configuration, and lifecycle management. 15+ years as a major partner of DigiCert, GlobalSign, and Sectigo.
Cite This Report



VMCcerts Research. (2026). Global BIMI Adoption Report 2026 [Research Report]. VMCcerts. https://vmccerts.com/research/global-bimi-adoption-report-2026
VMCcerts Research. “Global BIMI Adoption Report 2026.” VMCcerts, 2026, https://vmccerts.com/research/global-bimi-adoption-report-2026.
@techreport{vmccerts2026GlobalBIMIAdoption,
author = {VMCcerts Research},
title = {Global BIMI Adoption Report 2026},
institution = {VMCcerts},
year = {2026},
url = {https://vmccerts.com/research/global-bimi-adoption-report-2026},
note = {Dataset: VMCcerts BIMI Dataset v2026.2. Snapshot: 2026-07-02.}
}
TY – RPRT
AU – VMCcerts Research
TI – Global BIMI Adoption Report 2026
PY – 2026
PB – VMCcerts
UR – https://vmccerts.com/research/global-bimi-adoption-report-2026
ER –