3142
Retail certificates
15.5% of all BIMI certs
38.1%
High-notability rate
1237 globally recognised brands
+41%
2024 → 2025 growth
759 → 1071 annual issuances
878
Entrust certs
27.1% — highest sector Entrust %
11.6%
CMC adoption
376 certs — fastest growing path

01 · The competitive frame

What Your Competitors’ Inboxes Look Like Versus Yours

In retail, the open rate conversation is already well-understood. What is less frequently discussed is what happens in the inbox before the open — the moment when a recipient scans their inbox and makes a keep/delete decision based on visual signals. In a BIMI-aware inbox, that visual signal now includes a verified brand mark for senders who have deployed it.

The 38.1% high-notability rate in retail means that the brands who have deployed BIMI are disproportionately the ones with the strongest brand recognition — the large retailers whose customers make the most email-purchase decisions. A retailer without BIMI is not being compared to other non-BIMI senders. They are being compared against the BIMI-verified emails from the retailers who compete for the same customer attention.

“The retailers that deployed BIMI in 2024 and 2025 are not running experiments. They are establishing the visual standard that their customers’ inboxes now expect. Every promotional email that arrives without a verified mark arrives in a context where the verified mark exists elsewhere in the same inbox.”
Retail BIMI growth — 2020 to 2026 YTD
Consistent compounding — retail is in the early majority phase, not the early adopter phase

Retail issuances — 2020: 14; 2021: 98; 2022: 237; 2023: 481; 2024: 759; 2025: 1071; 2026 YTD: 585

02 · Geography

US Dominates, Europe Follows Tightly

CountryRetail certs% of retail sector totalVariance from global 15.5%
US United States141943.7%+0.4pp ↑
DE Germany2638.1%+6.1pp ↑↑
GB United Kingdom3229.9%+2.5pp ↑
AU Australia1414.3%+0.8pp ↑
SE Sweden1033.2%+5.2pp ↑↑
CA Canada922.8%−-2.2pp
NL Netherlands882.7%+0.8pp ↑
ES Spain842.6%+8.9pp ↑↑
Germany and Sweden retail overrepresentation

Germany (8.1% retail share) and Sweden (3.2%) both show retail BIMI penetration significantly above global average. Both markets have strong domestic retail brands with high consumer email engagement, strong ecommerce infrastructure, and DMARC enforcement rates that have been above the European average for several years. Spain’s 2.6% is the highest retail concentration in any major market — reflecting a concentrated deployment pattern among Spain’s major retail chains.

03 · The CMC opportunity

Why CMC Is the Natural Retail Path for Mid-Market Brands

Retail has 376 CMC certificates — 11.6% of the sector total and one of the fastest-growing CMC proportions across all sectors. The reason is structural: mid-market retail brands often trade under brand names for years before completing trademark registration, or trade under names that are difficult to trademark outright.

CMC requires documented prior commercial use of the logo — not a registered trademark. For a direct-to-consumer brand with 3–5 years of commercial history, a strong visual identity, and an active email programme, CMC is the immediate path to BIMI deployment without waiting 12–18 months for trademark registration to complete.

The CMC + retail growth signal

CMC grew from 8 certificates globally in 2023 to 1870 by July 2026. Retail’s growing CMC share suggests that the mid-market retail adoption wave — which drives the next 5,000 certificates in this sector — will be heavily CMC-led. Brands that have held off on BIMI because of trademark status should re-evaluate the CMC path. The inbox experience is identical to VMC.

04 · Entrust exposure

878 Retail Certificates Requiring Migration — The Highest Entrust % of Any Sector

Retail has the highest Entrust concentration of any major sector at 27.1% (878 certificates). This is above the global average of 21.9% and reflects retail’s early adoption in the 2021–2023 period, when Entrust was still actively issuing certificates and had a stronger market presence.

Why Entrust Exited the CA Market

In November 2024, Google announced that Chrome would stop trusting new TLS/SSL certificates issued by Entrust, citing a pattern of compliance failures and mis-issuances spanning several years. Mozilla Firefox followed with an equivalent public distrust decision. Because BIMI’s Verified Mark Certificate (VMC) and Common Mark Certificate (CMC) infrastructure relies on publicly-trusted Certificate Authority roots, this browser distrust effectively ended Entrust’s ability to issue new BIMI certificates. Entrust’s last BIMI certificate was issued in May 2025. As of the July 2026 dataset snapshot, only 0 Entrust BIMI certificates remain active globally — all expire by December 2026 with no renewal path. Existing holders must migrate to DigiCert, GlobalSign, or Sectigo before their certificate’s expiry date to avoid losing their verified inbox logo.

For retail organisations, an expired BIMI certificate during a peak trading period — Black Friday, January sales, back-to-school — carries commercial consequences beyond the brand trust impact. An email programme running a major promotional campaign without the verified inbox mark is sending into a competitive inbox context where verified competitors’ emails appear more credible. Migration planning should account for retail’s trading calendar, avoiding expiry during peak periods.

FAQ

Retail Sector Questions

How does BIMI affect abandoned cart email performance specifically?

Abandoned cart emails are sent to recipients who have recently interacted with the brand — they are high-intent, high-attention emails. The visual trust signal from BIMI is most valuable in exactly this context: a recipient who is deciding whether to re-engage with a purchase they nearly completed. A verified brand mark reinforces the legitimacy of the follow-up email in a moment of active decision-making. Retailers with BIMI deployed report that their highest-performing email types — abandoned cart, order confirmation, back-in-stock — are also the emails where the open rate lift from BIMI is most measurable.

Does my ecommerce platform (Shopify, Magento, WooCommerce) affect BIMI deployment?

Your ecommerce platform itself does not affect BIMI deployment. BIMI operates at the email sending domain and DNS level — independent of the platform generating your orders. What matters is your email service provider (the platform used to send marketing and transactional emails), whether that ESP signs emails with DKIM on your domain, and whether your DMARC policy is at enforcement. Most major ESPs support DKIM signing on custom domains. BIMI deployment is a DNS and certificate configuration task, not an ecommerce platform configuration task.

We trade under several brand names across different domains — how does BIMI work for multi-brand retailers?

Each sending domain requires its own BIMI certificate, its own DMARC policy, and its own SVG logo file. For a multi-brand retailer with 3–5 sending domains, this is a portfolio management task rather than a single deployment. VMCcerts manages multi-domain BIMI portfolios as a service — central expiry tracking, coordinated renewal scheduling, and unified reporting across all brand domains. The per-domain certificate cost scales linearly; the management overhead does not need to.
BIMI deployment for retail and ecommerce brands
VMCcerts supports retail brands with VMC and CMC deployment, multi-domain portfolio management, Entrust migration, and trading-calendar-aware renewal scheduling.
Cite This Report



VMCcerts Research. (2026). Retail and Ecommerce BIMI Benchmark 2026 [Research Report]. VMCcerts. https://vmccerts.com/research/retail-ecommerce-bimi-benchmark-2026
VMCcerts Research. “Retail and Ecommerce BIMI Benchmark 2026.” VMCcerts, 2026, https://vmccerts.com/research/retail-ecommerce-bimi-benchmark-2026.
@techreport{vmccerts2026RetailBIMI,
author = {VMCcerts Research},
title = {Retail and Ecommerce BIMI Benchmark 2026},
institution = {VMCcerts},
year = {2026},
url = {https://vmccerts.com/research/retail-ecommerce-bimi-benchmark-2026},
note = {Dataset: VMCcerts BIMI Dataset v2026.2. Snapshot: 2026-07-02.}
}
TY – RPRT
AU – VMCcerts Research
TI – Retail and Ecommerce BIMI Benchmark 2026
PY – 2026
PB – VMCcerts
UR – https://vmccerts.com/research/retail-ecommerce-bimi-benchmark-2026
ER –